Evidence based debate

Contributions to the debate thus far have made for interesting reading. Some have argued their case with passion and others from personal concerns or experiences. For those still to contribute, I encourage you to present your views as there is still much to discuss and to resolve.

Emma Johnstone - (Local Authority Representative) appears to have addressed some of the issues raised regarding IT infrastructure and access to equipment. Would the IT department against the motion care to respond?

Emma has also provided positive suggestions regarding collaboration and sponsorship - which might counter the arguments for budgetary concerns. Perhaps an industry stakeholder or governor would be available for comment?

We have heard how mobile technologies might facilitate learning 'on the move', but I do not believe we have yet addressed a very serious claim made by Godfrey (teacher) that "mobile technology has detrimental effect on traditional skills of learning and mastery of basic literacies". Can this claim be substantiated? Equally, how can the concerns about distribution of inappropriate materials be addressed?

On the subject of 'evidence', I am pleased to see that several submissions are now more 'evidence based', and I would encourage all participants to follow the links or references provided to ensure they have considered all sides of the argument. And perhaps the debate would benefit from some examples of technology in use, eg.a particular device or technology being used in a particular learning or teaching environment. We have been given the example of the Spanish teacher - but is that the only one?

One function of education is to prepare our young people for the real world and if we fail to recognise or embrace the technologies they are currently using, are we denying them the 'ownership' that has been described by Clare Roberts (teacher)? Please let us have your views.

Elizabeth Raymond

Chair